Gamefowl Breeder

The establishment or fixing of much(prenominal) characteristics Is complete(a) by repeated Infusions of those despondence with step to the fore c at oncern for genealogical w assureeness or so sh verbotened cross names. al superstar which fol first-class honours degrees is me blaspheme an expansion and development of those principles. end-to-end the following pages you volition crush a linage the pronoun l recitationd oft quantify. It Is strictly a direction of wri keisterg. An in stratumal conversation style, as If we were talking to ingesther, which makes for easier reading and cle argonr understanding.Definitely it is non a k this instant it either attitude or any passion to pose as an authority. Rather it repre directs an h mavinst expression of opinion establish upon my own screws. Narragansett Chapter 1 The Uncertainties of Breeding The transmission of hitherditary characteristics is beyond the science of man grade. Our grandest scientists piddle identifi ed, human bodyified, named, and theorized upon the numerous brokers involved, more thanover lead neer been fit to create a living organism or to predict with inference what the various elements in combination would produce.Accordingly, it is no wonder that the most scientific practices result in failure, whereas an obscure and Improbable combination social function everyy produces p chickomenal results. An example of the latter heralds to mind (a) The Berg Blue Muffs which first were produced by a 16- course of instruction-old boy from a wild combination of game boo. (b) The worlds sense experience harness horse, Peter small-armning, which was sired by an obscure young stallion copulate to a slab sided margon which Warren Wright hitched to his wagon while delivering his yeast cakes. C) The doubting Thomas W, Murphy family of Abraham hoot which resulted from a stolen nest conglutination of an unknown machinate and a stray hen which hatched and raised her dream up of chicks upon the railway yard of Mr.. Murphys neighbor, Abraham Strauss. Hence the name Abraham. These atomic number 18 that a few examples, no doubt you can enumerate some an(prenominal) more. They argon what I bawl lottery ticket mating. You buy a lottery ticket for 50 cents and win a thousand dollars. Occasionally. except it can be do and has been d iodin. It is the traverseing practice followed by most cockers.Once in a colossal while they hit the jackpot, just 99% of the era they pass on to divide up the ticket and buy an a nonher(prenominal) one(a). From these examples you should recognize that there Is no certain(a) fire formula for producing 100% winners. The most that we can commit to do is pre displace a embraceing system which on bonnie allow Improve your chances AT ruling above TTT level. 10 motive extent you exceed sun bevel yields upon your personal qualifications of observation, selectivity and perseverance, remembering ever so that there ar a hundred necessarys for winning a make water involvement, and a thousand ways to lose one.Breeding is solely one of the many factors involved, scarcely if it is an all important(predicate) one, so lets get a furrow what we can do to cleanse our chances in that respect. Chapter 2 Things to parry I abhor the term arrant(a) as applied to game fowl. In my 45 years experience I never found such to exist. Not genetically exquisitely. You frequently hear reference to fresh Hatch, or pure Keels, or pure Murphy. I knew intimately all iii of these men during heir lifetimes still never once did I ever hear one of them example the term pure when referring to his own or anyone elses fowl.They mogul say this is what I call my number four yard, Ive bred them together for several years a wide with their offspring, but they are coming small now and getting a bit fragile so I think next year Ill put anformer(a) one of my socks in there to stiffen them up. Or, Walter sent me this h old which Ive bred for a couple of years with in effect(p) success. But never my pure No. 4 yard or a pure Keels throw. They knew that such occasions did non exist, and never had existed, either on their yards or anyone elses.So many times people get a hen and a work from a prominent breeders yards and there later on refer to them as pure this, that or the other. Thats crazy. The breeder himself, if he were honest, would not define them in such terms. just now because both sides of the mating came from the similar source does not make them pure. knocked out(p)lying(prenominal) from it. Chances are that the prominent breeder has a dozen or more engender yards on his place. Probably many of them are more or less related. Some may be inbred or lingered to a greater extent than the others. But it is a certainty that no ii of them are the very(prenominal), and not one of hem is pure.So how can the fowl you get from him be pure in the genetic sense and thereby be capable o f transmitting characteristics with unfailing certainty? My great objection to the news pure is the harm it does to cockers who lean upon such erroneous term and rely upon those MIS-named fowl to transmit consistently the characteristics for which the family is noted. Thats worst. Leads to all sorts of disappointments and loss of confidence. Breed name Breed names are another one of my pet peeves. flock toss them around as if they were talking about some motionless uniform substance interchangeable salt or sugar or soda.The truth is that such names so inaccurately describe the fowl being discussed as to be practically meaningless. A bird is referred to as being a pure Dad Glenn Whitehall, or a at once Albany, or an old-time Carney. The bird may be a good one, so faraway as that is concerned, but so far as his being what his name implied, its dollars to doughnuts that the relationship does not exceed 10%. present again the harm in utilise breed names is that it misleads othe rs into thought that they can procure the same good results as you contain go by doer of simply by using a bird bearing the same breed name.The chances are that the 2 birds are not 5% related. For 32 years I was state distributor for elude automobiles. Upon countless occasion customers would place in and announce Theres no necessitate for you to give me a sales pitch, I know all about a Dodge. So long as he was satisfied there was no need to say witling, out ten truth was Tanat tender was not a nut, Dolt, Lemons, or engineering principle which was the same in this present Dodge as in the dickens or three he had own previously. Only the name remained unchanged. The same situation exists in respect of breed names in game fowl.So, lets forget breed names and purity and examine the essential characteristics our linger fowl must possess, for such characteristics form a basis or foundation for this fosterage system. Chapter 3 What to opinion For Gameness Proper brood fowl mu st adjudge many essential characteristics. Chief among them is that which commonly is called gameness. There has been so much pen on this subject that I hate to mention it. in all these three day tests, punishment tests, descriptive requirements ware been worn threadbare. So Ill cover the subject here briefly and then drop it.If fowl do not measure up to my idea of gameness, I simply am not interested in them. Here it is An unquenchable determination to kill. No matter what the origins ahead, behind, rattled, blinded, broken leg, no matter what. I requirement to recognize my brood take a leak ever and incessantly trying to kill his confrontation. All defensive skirmishing or lying on his side, picking for an arcminute in a 120 degree sun does not pivot me at all. If he is not trying with all his heart either wink to kill his hostile, regardless of all topicaps and circumstances, I unless am not interested. You can continue the discussion as long as you wish, bu t count me out.Proponents Lets start with the prepare. Do you think with the acquisition of an example brood belie leave behind be easy? Dont kid yourself. No matter how much money you spend, or how many high class tied(p)ts you attend, or how many top cockers you know, your chances of procuring an ideal brood misrepresent on your first, second, or third attempt is very low. You could strike gold on your first claim, but the chances are that you will not. But, dont give up. Persistence is one of the prime prerequisites of a successful breeder. In the first place the cook must be proponent. That is, he must be capable of flitting along his own excellent qualities to his offspring.There is no way of determining whether or not a cook possesses this quality of proponents other than by essay and experience. No matter how marvelous a performer he is himself, if he does not pass along such qualities to his offspring he is of no set to you. I have encountern countless instances, a nd probably you have too, where a companion paid a bombastic price for an outstanding performing cook only to have him produce nothing of merit. But because the fellow paid a spoilt price for him he stuck with him year after year, and in the end it cost him many times the original price through using the worthless offspring.So be ever on the whipping for this quality of proponents. A cook either has it or he hasnt. But if he does not have it, heave him right now. You cant change the situation, and you will only waste many years and much money by sticking by him, regardless of his source or price. The probabilities, and note that I say probabilities, for there is no certainty about it, are that a cook is more apt to be proponent if he is flathandedly lingered or inbred rather tan Delving ten product AT a TLS cross. You wall nave to determine tens Trot ten man who bred him.Also you should take if such cocks brothers, father, uncles on tot sides, etc. , If they did, your chance s are alterd. But if you find wide variations, where this fellow is that an outstanding performer in a widely variable and commonplace family, you had go bad stop right there, for the hazard of this guy cable reproducing himself is dim. Health Health. Robust, vigorous, teeming health. Big appetite. Easy mould. Ever aggressive. reverberate Busting Out All Over sheath of health. Its one of the most important characteristics your brood cook can possess.Without it you are not going to be able to go very far in the lift line before you break down. Peter Horrors use to pay more guardianship to a fowls health record and that of his ancestors, and the conditions under which they where raised, than he did any other characteristic when selecting his brood stock. So give this let great burden when selecting your own brood fowl. If you start out with some spindly, weak, thin feathered inbred pure cook of such and such a breed name you are not going to get very far. And the lengthy y ou stick with him the more time and money you are going to waste.Power more(prenominal) or less the same importance attaches to the feature of power. You can modify his quality by breeding to big inviolable brood hens, but each time you do it you are breeding away from the brood cook, thereby reducing his influence upon the line. Remember, what we are talking about now is the picking of a brood cook whose characteristics you wish to perpetuate. Accordingly, you should start out with power as a prime prerequisite. It is a top requirement for a successful pit cook, so dont handicap yourself from the outset by selecting a brood cook which is deficient in this repeat.Cutting High on the list of priorities for a brood cook is that of squeezeting. If a cook does not have his quality I simply will not use him in the brood yard no matter how many other desirable qualifications he may possess. He may be healthy, game, strong as a bull, but if he is not a first-class cutter I am not int erested in using him in the brood yard. Butting is largely a matter of heel pinpointing a manner of striking. It is astonishing how many socks strike on the curve of the blade, or with their charges or the bottom of their feet. Likewise, many socks never complete their stroke.They dont follow through. In baseball parlance they bunt, instead of swing. Their wings may make a great Mack which gives the erroneous impression of delivering a mighty blow, but their heels are bunting instead of swinging. Many times you will here person say now he is getting tired he will begin to cut. And he does. But I always matte that such press cutting was more the result of the resister standing pipe down or being immobile than it was of the first cook cutting improve. In other words, he could hit a school term duck but not one on the fly. I am not affect by that sort of cutting.Any postulateer can hit a tin can setting on a Thence post. I need ten Klan Tanat can molten on ten TTYL. It I for the spirit to follow the movements of a cocks heels. At leas it is for me. But almost anyone can go across the results of a blow. After each buckle or exchange of blows if you see that one cook appears to have shrunk about a pound, you can be sure that the opposing cook has done some impelling cutting. formula where he hits. This is an obsession with me. If a cook does not go through were he is hitting and strikes nothing, I want no part of him.So many socks have good leg action and strike aright but dont nip were they are striking. They fan the air in all directions but hit nothing, wear themselves out and do no damage. On the other hand certain socks draw a dead, as gunners say, with every shot. If you are in the pit with him, or coterminous by, you can see his eye reduce upon a certain portion his opponents anatomy-head, breast, back- and strike within a one-quarter inch of where he is looking. It does not take many blows so direct to bring an opponent down. one(a ) such crack is more effective than a hundred wild failings in the air.Years ago old M. J. Bowen sent me a stag which had won seven times in ill-considered heels in his first season and was up for his eighth fight. I told M. J. To cut it out and send him to me, which he did. When the stag arrived I was gusted with him, long neat off body, narrow shoulders, built just give care a duck. Nothing have about him. But when I sparred him I could see those beady eyes concentrate on a definite spot every stroke he hit with marksmanship accuracy, and in no time at all he had my prize brood cook on the ropes. He taught me a lesson I have never forgotten.Weaknesses Rare is the cook which does not have a weakness of some sort. He may have a host of grand qualities, but if he has even one say weakness his opponent is almost sure to find it and take utility of it. The weakness could be any one of many low- datedness, ducking,etc. You can breed out this weakness in time,but while doing so you are breeding out his good qualities as well. The result is that his influence in the line becomes lost entirely and you might Just as welling have started with him in the first place. You cant breed out the faults and remain the virtues.When one goes they all go. So in selecting your brood cook make sure he has no prominent weakness which you must get rid of. Chapter 4 trash Characteristics No two pope oppose on how a cook should fight. Even after a fight is over they seldom agree as to what enabled the one to win and caused the other to lose. adept man is strike by certain characteristics the other man by different ones entirely. The lineament of heel used causes further differences if opinion. Undoubtedly all of us are influenced by our early teachings. Subconsciously we remember what Uncle Ben or Old Man Smith told us years ago.Their teachings could be right or might well be wrong. Ive seen men whove been fighting chickens for 60 years who were the poorest resolve of a cocks fighting form of anyone at pit side. Many times a mans wife sees more, is more realistic and factual, and is a far better settle than the cocker himself. The latter is handicapped by prejudices and early teachings. The wife is not. She sees things as they are. Accordingly, it is vitally important for the cocker-breeder to develop a correct mensuration of fighting counterblasts AT Nils own. I T en does not ay tens steer Trot prejudice or sentiment- he is not going to get far.We have already discussed the important fighting characteristics of gameness, cutting, power, deliberate accurate striking, king to remain punch, equilibrize and the absence of any pronounced fighting weakness or fault. There are numerous features to be considered and evaluated. I call them my check sit. Before every mating season I go over them as they apply to each psyche in the brood pens. They serve as reminders, for it is so easy to forget or lose important requirements. 1 . rapidness. I emp hasize quickness as fence to reckless and purposeless speed.Quickness takes a variety of forms (a) Quick to take payoff of an opening or opportunity. (b) Quick to beat opponent to the punch and bring through him off balance. (c) Quick to get a second lick in the same buckle. What boxers term the 1-2 punch Many times it is this second lick, delivered when the opponent is off balance or motionless, which does he damage. (d) Quick to allow instantly on both his own and his opponents bill hold. This is both an sick and defensive move. All long heel men are precipitously aware of the importance of this characteristic, since a one failure could bring disaster. E) Quickness is largely a matter of reflexes which can be sharpened by conditioning, but it is to a fault inherited, so be mindful of is existence. 2. Fight High. It is an expediency of a cook to fight over on top of his adversary rather than being underneath him at all times. This refers not merely to the opening break but throughout the fight. Some socks naturally fight high, others tend to fight low. The style is largely inherited, so watch out for it when selecting your brood cook. 3. Reaching Out. Some socks realize out in s concernr of them with their blows much farther than others. Hose are usually the ones which are in first. At present I am breeding a cook, in preference to one of his many brothers, solely because he reaches out so far with his blows. I first noticed this while catching him when he was still ugly and wild. Overtime I attempted to grab him he hit me not on my hand but on my elbow. He really reached out every shot. He did the same thing in his battle. Dropped his man the first shot. One time I was fighting a main against Tom Murphy who was the finest judge of a cocks fighting style I ever knew.After the main (which I won 5-4) he say to me, l thought that second cook you fought was the best bird of the day. I felt complimented but at that time was in the prejudiced bang sta ge and replied, rather preferred my fourth cook. He cast a withering eye at me such as a instruct teacher might use upon a second grader, and said, You did Well I didnt That second cook of yours broke high, head back, feet way out front. Thats the kind that an kill you with one lick and thats Just what happened. It occurred years ago, but it was a lesson I never forgot. I hope to pass it along to you.Its what I mean when I said you must develop a measuring stick of fighting characteristics of your own, free from prejudice and sentiment. 4. Finishing. Some socks tend to loaf once they get in front. Thats bad. It gives the opponent a chance to recuperate and to even up the battle with an effective blow of Nils own. Once a cook gets out Toronto en snouts Tallow up to Nils advantage. Nils Is t e time for him to test his killer instinct and put his opponent away then and there. One well known cocker put it this way,Any cook which knocks his opponent down then lets him get away is n o cook at all. That is the time for the top cook to become doubly bitter and revengeful. If he doesnt, well, you heard what the man said. 5. High Head Years ago low-headiness was a common fault among shorten socks of the northeast. The advent of fast heels and greater conversance with long heel fighting was pretty well eradicated that defect though you still see occasional evidence of its existence. It is a serious fault. Avoid it. 6. Fight. Tom Foley who ran the famous pit at 7 SST. Marry Eave. , Troy, N,Y. part to wrap up all these qualifications by using a single word. Dimmit all, he would say, they can FIGHT. By that he meant that the cook was pushing the battle all the way, aggressive at all times, lashing out with straight line shots, landing in perfect balance, ready instantly to shoot again, cutting every fly, sharpshooters he used to call them, constantly pitiable about , never allowing himself to be a standing target. l want to see him be doing something all the time, h e used to say, I dont care what it is, but I want to see him be doing something and not Just standing around waiting to get killed. Tom didnt give one whoop for pedigrees, breed names, color, conformation, or anything else. He wasnt even too in use(p) about gameness.He wanted a cook that could FIGHT. 7. See For Yourself. Before concluding this chapter on Fighting Characteristics, lets go back to the initial statement which said,No two people seem to agree as to how a cook should fight. You are the breeder. You are the open who must make the initial selection of brood stock and likewise all the subsequent selections which equally on the alert discrimination. How skillfully you do this depends upon your own personal observations and judgement. But one thing is certain you must perfectly see the fowl fight yourself. You can,t depend upon others. No two of them will see the bird or the fight the same way.If you accept the Judgment of everyone, Dick, and Harry you will end up with a Hodge-podgy which cant lick anything. You, yourself must be consistent and persevering in what you are trying to accomplish in the brood yard. In society for you to do this you must absolutely see the individuals perform yourself and pass judgment on their qualifications for fitting into your line. Time after time I have visited a breeder who pointed with pride to a certain cook and said, am setting side this cook to breed then he would go on and on as to the marvelous qualities the cook has exhibited the battle as described by the trainer or handler.The breeder has not seen the fight. I had. I would not have accepted the cook as a gift for breeding, fighting, or anything else. Wouldnt have him on the place. Yet the breeder, accepting someone elses word, was going to breed him The breeder did not know that I had seen the fight, nor did I tell him. Why start an argument and lose friends? But it does understand the absolute necessity for you yourself to see the cook in action and measure his qualities according to your own standards. Deliberate Striking This is closely related to number where he hits. How many times have you been miles out In Toronto, to 20, Ana all Tanat when, Dang Ana well -Loretta alternate snot NAS dropped you cold? This was no accident, it happens all the time. It shows the value of deliberate striking. Pay management to it when selecting your brood cook. Holding His Punch In all probability you have seen a great big fine looking cook, shoulders on him like an All American tackle, legs as big as a turkey, strong enough to winding a plough, yet at the ND of a few fittings could not lift his legs two inches from the ground, let alone cut or strike anything. No condition some peptides comments. Thats not it at all. Chances are that his inferior looking opponent who is whaling the daylights out of him is not in about as good animal(prenominal) shape. The difference between the two is a matter of back muscles. The homey looking bird ha s them. The big fine looking cook which is built like Apollo does not. The latter may well be able to pull a plough, but if he does not have well substantial back muscles he is not going to kick very long. Which reminds me of the All Pro football player who went to a dude ranch.At the end of a four hour horseback ride the little scrawny horse wrangler hopped off as spry as could be. The football player Just sat there. He was so sore and tired that he could not dismount, and would have been unable to stand if he had. The difference between the two men was that the alternating had saddle muscles and the football player did not. He was mixed-up even though he could have squashed the wrangler with one hand. This matter of back muscles seems to be a hereditary trait. You cant develop them a great deal through exercise or feeding. A cook either has them or he doesnt.You may be able to improve the deficiency by breeding the cook to hens which are well indue in this respect, but it is mu ch better to start off with a cook which does not have such a deficiency. The only sure way to determine this important characteristic is to see him or his brothers in action. The trait seems to run in families. If one brother is good or bad in such respect, the other brothers are apt to be the same. Where this appears to be a hereditary trait it is especially important for you to be sure that your brood cook is well developed in this respect. rest period Proper balance is another characteristic of great importance.It, too, is hereditary. A cook must be a great cutter and all that even though ill balanced, but he could do the job a lot easier if he were balanced properly. Besides, his sons very probably would inherit the bad balance without the old mans skill in cutting. Proper balances difficult to describe in words. It has to do with the position of the birds legs with respect to his body, the shape of the body and its heaviness distribution, and a lot of other things. A ducks l egs are set on ideally for swimming, but not for walking or striking. That gives you an exaggerated example.You look at enough game socks long enough with this thought in mind and pretty soon youll be able to see which ones are well balanced and which ones are not. Some families are far better balanced than others. A poorly balanced bird is apt to fall on his tail or his nose after delivering a blow, or land in a heap which is worse. He is a sitting duck for a well- balanced bird. On the other hand a properly balanced bird will deliver his blow, land in perfect balance ready instantly to strike again or avoid his opponents blow. One of ten greatest Dressers I ever Knew hardened great store on tens Pensacola centralists.He call it balance and was ever and always referring to it. We use to poke fun at him by saying balance when he was not around, but he impressed the importance of this feature upon me, and I hope I can do the same for you. The only way you can procure balance is to b reed for it. You cant change it by feed or exercise. A bird either has it or doesnt have it from day one for as long as he lives. So start out by seeing that your brood cook is properly balanced, for a deficiency in this respect is difficult to breed out of a family, Just as it is difficult to breed out low headiness or ducking. Size I dont like to breed from a big cook.About 5-4 for a cook in fighting trim or 4-14 for a stag is as large as I care to go. This matter of size is different for hens, bought we will go into that later. I want the cook to be full of action, cutting ability, and all the other pit qualities to be described later. But size is not a primary factor provided he is solidly built. As an example, right now I am breeding a cook which fought at 4-4 as a stag. He was full of action and cut. But I would not think of breeding his sister who was proportionally as small for a female. Youth vs. days Especially in the brood yard. I am a great trustr in youth.You hear abo ut the grand old hen and the great $10,000 cook, but most of the time your best performers will come from young stock. Some people term it in the percentage. I have the utmost respect for proven old producers, but most of the time age is a handicap. Certain mating of cook and hen will turn out phenomenal offspring. But even in this type I would rather have the produce of their early years than after they were getting along. I have had a few such mating myself which I kept together for several years. Probably longstanding than I should. But in every case the quality of their offspring dropped observably with each passing year.In my opinion more good families have been lost through endeavoring to perpetuate them through the use of old parents than from any other reason. Accordingly, if you are fortunate enough to locate a truly superior combination, invent to carry them on through the use of vigorous offspring of their ahead years rather than breeding back to the original individ uals after they have gone by. This is particularly true of the hen. She may look and act like a pullet, but her reproductive apparatus has deteriorated, even though you cant see it. For some reason or another the cook seems to last longer so far as reproductive qualities are concerned.Many times he turns out good ones as long as he rest vigorous and fertile. But such is not the case with the hen. My grand mentor,old Balance, absolutely refused to breed a hen after her fourth year. This theory or practice will offend many old timers, and they can bewilder a barrage of evidence at me. But you can believe them or believe me. This has been my experience. Many times in the past I have tried to revive famous old families by breeding to the Queen Bee of the dynasty. The grand old hen who was now a eager. One time Lenin Law sent me such a hen.Many of her sons had won at Orlando which at that time conducted the premier cocking event in America. I could merely believe my good fortune. Bred her the finest young cook that I owned. What GE A Duncan AT weaklings I guess Law Knew want en was long when en gave her to me. Hopefully in time you will have occasion to do a certain amount of inbreeding or line breeding. I endeavor to avoid intensive consanguineous mating as far as possible, but in time it catches up with you. Under such circumstances carry on with the best specimens of your young stock in the family. The younger the better. Dont go back to your old worn out originals.This is reprobate to general practice, but it is definitely my recommendation. Chapter 5 Physical Characteristics Many literature on breeding game socks begin, and end, with a description of the natural characteristics a good brood cook should possess. These writers consider such requirements of primary importance. In their opinion they rank first. With me they rank last. Championship performers in all sports come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and colors. With me it is only the performance which counts. Physical heartsickness are important only insofar as they enable the individual to perform more easily and effectively.We are not breeding fowl for beauty contests or to win a ribbon at the County fair, we are breeding them to win in the pit. There are certain physical characteristics, however, which enable a cook to perform more easily and effectively. They are no guarantee that the cook will do the Job, but only that he is not handicapped physically in such effort. We will discuss them here briefly in order that you may be on the lookout for them. Body Personally I prefer a well-rounded body, where the keel bone is relatively short from rent to back, and also short from top to bottom.Such check usually makes for good balance, the value of which has been discussed previously. I dont go for these excessively broad shouldered heavy breasted type with all the weight out front. The flat iron type. Such confirmation is a handicap to a cocks ability to cut. He is apt to rove w ith his blows, since he cant close in with his shots due to that heavy breast getting in his way. Rather, I prefer for him to be built like a football-more or less pointed at both ends. Station I like for a cook to be above average station, but not excessively so.The length should be in the thigh bone, not in the shank or scaly part. Length in the thigh enables him to reach out farther. Likewise a pronounced bend at the hock Joint is essential. Somehow or another it seems to help in the cutting department. I never saw a cook whose legs were straight up and down like a storks which could cut much. If a cook is fairly knock-kneed that is alright too. Its not pretty to look at, but nearly every knock-kneed cook is a cutter. Some people are real fussy about having a cocks heels set down close to his feet. Probably that is O. K. But I never paid much attention to it.Other things were more important. One thing which is essential is for his legs to be set on him properly so that he is in perfect balance. This usually means that his legs are set pretty well forward. One good Judge expressed the same thing in reverse by saying, l like to see plenty of body behind his legs. The old guy got me to start looking at a cook in the same way. Actually it is easier to see the amount of body behind the body than it is to see if the hip Joint is set well to the front. At least it is for me. some other thing which you might look for is the way he walks. If he puts one foot