Rhetoric in Into the Wild Essay

Appeals to Logos*Strategy 1 describing McCandlesss intelligence. Ex. 1 In the third chapter of the novel, where Krakauer describes McCandlesss relationship with Wayne Westerberg, he discusses Chris McCandlesss family and education in brief. Specifically, Krakauer whilepowertions, In May 1990, Chris graduated from Emory University in Atlanta, and had distinguished himself as a history and anthropology major with a 3.72 variant-point average (Krakauer 20). This presents a side of Chris that appeals to bulks logos and makes them think. The main question that pops into mind is, how could such a novel kid make such a dumb err wholenessousness? This intrigue keeps the reader immersed in the book, and therefore continues to hold their attention.Ex. 2 afterwards on in the novel, around the midsection of chapter eleven, Krakauer describes McCandless in much depth. He duologue or so his social life, what he was bid as a young boy, and what he was like when he grew. There is another size equal example of Krakauer using McCandlesss intelligence to appeal to logos, and that is when he quotes maven of Chriss high school caterpillar track teammates, Eric Hatha charge. Hath by remembers, Chris brought home substantially grades. He didnt get into trouble, he was a high achi ever so, he did what he was supposed to do (Krakauer 114). Again, Krakauer sets up a good image of how smart Chris was. Readers also learn that he was diligent and hardworking, and they can understand how it would connect into Chriss persistence in the Alaskan wild.*Strategy 2 talks about when McCandless did illogical things, to interest readers. Ex. 1 In the beginning of the novel, when Krakauer talks about McCandlesss journey into the Mojave Desert, he mentions that Chris did whatsoeverthing really ridiculous. Krakauer re deals his actions in this way in a gesture that would render done both Tolstoy and Thoreau proud, he arranged all his paper currency and put a sum to it. One hundred twenty-three dollars in legal tender was like a shot reduced to ash and smoke (Krakauer 29). Krakauer describes Chriss donation of his college fund to munificence a couple of pages later in the book. Yet, when one reaches that page, they have to rarity why Chris didnt rightful(prenominal) keep his money with him, so he could donate it later, or at to the lowest degree buy some supplies. This leads to more curiosity about McCandlesss habitual sense, which in turn entices the readers however onward.Ex. 2 Near the end of the book, when Krakauer returns to the subject of McCandlesss journey into the Alaskan wild, he talks about the meager amount of food McCandless carried, and alludes to Chriss ignorance. He says about McCandless, hed subsisted for more than a calendar month beside the Gulf of California on five pounds of rice and a good- allow of fish caught with a cheap rod and reel, make him confident he could harvest enough food for an extended stay in the Alaskan wilderness too (Krakauer 162). Any person who reads this automatically questions Chriss common sense, because they wonder how he could possibly think California is anything like Alaska. not only that, exactly the fact that Chris purposely neglected to pack good supplies makes mess find him arrogant, and, in young peoples slang, a douche-bag.Appeals to Ethos *Strategy 1 Describing the moral values of Chris McCandlessEx. 1 In the middle of the book, in chapter eleven, Krakauer includes responses from people who knew Chris in college and high school. One of his female running teammates, Kris Maxie Gillmer, recounts how determined McCandless always was about righting social injustices. Proof of this is set up in his ranking(prenominal) year of high school. Krakauer confirms, McCandless took lifes inequities to heart. During his senior year at Woodson, he became obsessed with racial oppression in South Africa (Krakauer 113). Krakauer whitethorn have included only this event and a few others li ke it throughout the novel, but it leaves no doubt in the readers mind that McCandless hated injustice. This wows the reader, making them bring out just how high Chriss ethics were. One could call it a knotty attempt by Krakauer to eke out sympathy for McCandless from the readers.Ex. 2 In the fourth bulge out chapter of the novel, Detrital Wash, Krakauer describes Chris on his two month journey in the Western part of the cracking United States. He also mentions how McCandlesss parents, worried sick, hired a private detective. The investigator began an extensive search, and finally found teaching in December, when he learned from an inspection of tax records that Chris had given away his college fund to OXFAM (Krakauer 31). The fact that Chris donated his college fund to charity also casts him in a good, moral light. However, the ironic thing is that OXFAM is an organization dedicated to feeding starving people, and that Chris McCandless died of starvation. Either way, this appeal to ethos also makes people view Chris in a better light, perhaps to make them feel like he was a great person.*Strategy 2 Describing the moral flaws of Chris McCandless Ex. 1 Krakauer says in the fountains note at the beginning of the novel that he will leave it to the readers to form their own opinions about McCandless, so it only seems essential that he would include negative points about the boys morals as well. Although he had a rigorous moral code, he made the strangest exceptions. Krakauer says, he was also able to forgive, or overlook, the shortcomings of his literary heroes Jack capital of the United Kingdom was a notorious drunk Tolstoy went on to father at least thirteen children, some of whom were conceived at the same time the censorious count was thundering in print against the evils of sex (Krakauer 122). When readers see this little note, they see how strange Chriss moral code was. He wouldnt cut his father for living a lie, and yet, he praised and adored hy pocritical men who did even worse things than his father. This appeals to peoples ethics because it makes them think about their own morals, not just Chriss.Ex. 2 Krakauer discusses McCandlesss relationship with his family several(prenominal) times during the book. According to the family and the people who knew McCandless, he was mainly only ever close with his younger sister, Carine. Carine remembers this about her brother, He was always really beautiful to me, and extremely protective. Hed hold my hand when we walked down the street. When he was in junior high and I was still in grade school hed hang out at his adorer Brian Paskowitzs house so we could walk home together (Krakauer 110). This may be just a simple phrase, but it drastically appeals to a readers ethic views as well. One cannot help but wonder why Chris, who apparently loved his younger sister and protected her, could possibly leave without saying a word to her. He got aggravated about his fathers lies, but he so mehow doesnt think what hes doing is the same. It is as if he trusts other people more than his family and the sister he loves. Appeals to Pathos*Strategy 1 Arousing bewilderment of McCandless Ex. 1 If one reads the novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, it is almost unfeasible to miss the biased way Krakauer writes about the exploits of Chris McCandless. He makes Chris sound like this really great guy with a thirst for adventure, which draws readers in. an example of this is Krakauers comparison between himself and McCandless in the chapter titled, The Stikine Ice Cap. Krakauer writes, I couldnt disagree stealing up to the edge of doom and peering over the brink. The hint of what was hidden in those shadows terrified me, but I caught sight of something in the glimpse, some forbidden and elemental riddle that was no less compelling than In my caseand, I believe, in the case of Chris McCandlessthat was a very diverse thing from wanting to die (Krakauer 156). This description makes the readers picture a great visionary in the look of society, someone who was willing to take risks and was unbound by earthly desires. It makes them admire McCandlesss bravery as well, which is, of course, evoking emotion.Ex. 2 Krakauer focuses on many admirable things McCandless does, but one important one, assist the homeless and destitute, really stands out. Krakauer comments, McCandless would wander the seedier quarters of Washington, chatting with prostitutes and homeless people, buying them meals, badly suggesting ways they might improve their lives (Krakauer 113). This really tugs at peoples hearts, making them look up to Chris. Many see these examples of kindness and deal they could be more like McCandless. In all effect, this puts Chris at a higher standard with other people.*Strategy 2 Focusing on how depressed everybody was when they learned Chris was dead.Ex. 1 Of course, the main example of this would be when Carine McCandless learns that her high-priced brother , Chris, was found dead. According to Krakauers information on her reaction, Carines eyes blurred, and she felt the onset of tunnel vision. Involuntarily, she started shaking her head fend for and forth, back and forth Then she began to scream Carine curled up on the commit in a fetal position, wailing without pause She remained hysterical for the near five hours (Krakauer 130). This really makes readers angry at Chris McCandless. They think he was a jerk for leaving his family, and they further fume about how he could have saved everyone so much pain if only hed been prepared and not so arrogant about being able to survive.Ex. 2 Another extremely depressing example of appealing to shame is when Krakauer describes the reaction of Ronald Franz, a man who grew extremely close to and fond of Chris when he helped him out in California. Franz was devastated when he heard the news of Chriss death. He says, I asked God to keep his finger on the shoulder of that one But he let Alex die I renounced the Lord. I couldnt believe in a God who would let something that terrible run across I bought a bottle of whiskey wasnt used to drinking, so it made me sick. Hoped itd kill me, but it didnt (Krakauer 60). Again, this makes readers extremely sad. In a way, it actually shocks them too. It takes something very powerful to make a man renounce his faith, and readers can only begin to try and grasp what Franz was feeling.