Article Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 7

Article revue - Essay ExampleThis elbow grease did much to shift the guidance from job recovery to the national debt. though some from the conservative stance felt the afternoon tea party travail was exactly what the nation needed, proponents such as Sarah Palin had a very different view. She supported the insurgency much more so than the attracter of the movement. She was very much against the movement being defined by any one leader or party. TEA AND SYMPATHY Who owns the American Revolution? (Tanenhaus,2012) The phrase uses metaphor to describe the Boston Tea Party ship. Though there is a replica that is discussed I believe in this article the discussion demonstrates that show of the Tea party Movement. Jill Lepore goes on to describe one business commentators outrage of the federal governments bailout plan, demanding a new Tea Party. He insisted on the unloading of derivative securities into Lake Michigan. The article highlights the importance of the Founding fathers a nd those pillowcases that transpired in 1773 comparing them in a way as to give the whimsy that at onces Tea Party movement is small in comparison and lacks the convictions of those of that time. Jill Lepores preconceived idea seems to be in agreement with the arguments she presented in the article, and is in agreement that no ill-tempered leader or party should be on whole responsible for the Tea Party movement and that those who are considered Tea party faithfuls are emphatic of quixotic crusades (Tanenhaus,2012). Lepore disagree that the tea leaf Party movement has a misguided view of the American Revolutionary period (Mohamed, 2011). Lepore uses sources such as Christen Varley, responsible for holding monthly Tea Party movement meetings and CNBC business commentator grow Santelli. Lepore suggests that if the Tea party is to be thought of as fundamentalism history and its review will not mixed bag these thoughts. No Thanks for the Memories Gordon S. Wood (Wood, 2011) This article is veritablely a response to the Jill Lepore book The Whites of Their Eyes The Tea Partys Revolution and the Battle over American History, (Princeton University Press, 2011). He describes Jill Lepores attitudes and opinions as mocking and describes her discussions as ramblings of present day Tea Party movement issues with those of the Revolution. He considers her question of what our forefathers would do to be a question that is not only pointless but serves little purpose then to provoke parley towards what seems to be her favorite subject, the American Revolution. Lepore regards the Tea Party as an ageless and nearly sacred event almost to the point of worship. Throughout her book she constantly reiterates that in the case of the Tea Party movement history is clearly not understood and possibly incapable of being understood by todays government. She dismisses interpretative doctrine of original ideas as fundamentalism (Woods, 2011). Woods opinion is that Lepore should ha ve as her focus memory of the American Revolution more so than emotional ties and that these ties cloud and bias her vision and opinion. He expresses concern that her scientific credentials are not demonstrated and that the book leaves us with little actual understanding of the Tea Party movement. He feels the book should have