Preservation of Justice as the Power to Rightness Essay

Preservation of Justice as the Power to Rightness - Essay ExampleIn the radiate off the d fell, Anselm says the angels that did non f all(prenominal) are free, and yet cannot sin. This proves that to Anselm, immunity construes the right, and ability to act in the right reason, or meaning having the right intention that cannot guide on to sin. In this paper I pass on review the validity of Anselms argument in the statement that after Satan fell, the angels that did not fall are free and yet cannot sin. First I will judge Anselms view relating to the temperament of God, secondly, I will review Anselms argument concerning, world and the essence of existence. This will then lead to the relation between being, and preservation of good and evil, evaluating how a being is regarded to be good or evil as related to act and intention of much(prenominal) a being. Finally I will evaluate the dilemma concerning freedom of choice, which will be essential in proving the hypothesis above. In Anselms argument on free will, God, angels and humans are considered as discerning beings able make viable decisions. Anselm view referee as the ability to will what one ought to will, meaning they possessed rightness in willing what they ought to will, and wickedness they were rational beings, the good angles had the potential to sin, but refrained form it by choice. The essence of any being is to obtained justice by wiling what they ought to will just as the good angels refrained from sin. ... er He has, and all other things sport something only from him, and just as they have from themselves only nothing, so they have from him only something (Anselm, 216). Anselm argues that everything has its essence by dint of God, and nothing exists devoid of his power and will. This affirms the importance of will in any action. God having been the first being to will implies that any subsequent rational beings have to share this quality. God being the absolute rational being, could on ly have created other rational beings in his own image, meaning that as God has freedom to will, only so could other rational beings be created. God has imparted the freedom to choose in all rational beings. Secondly, Anselm elaborates on the will and freedom of God to create and preserve any being. God is liable for being, and what is as He conserve in existence what is. Every being is, because it was created by God, and He conserves it in existence. The theme of conservation in this case is responsible for the state of everything which is, without which a being cannot be. and if you consider existing things when they pass to not being, God does not cause them not to be. exclusively also being cannot remain how it was made except by his conserving (Anselm, 217). It is through conservation that a being is, without which the being would return to not being. Ekenberg (17) further elaborates this notion by arguing that God is only a cause of what is, not of what is not. God accordi ng to Anselm cannot make something not to be, but by removing his conserving over the being, such a being automatically returns where it belonged to in not being. Therefore, Gods will is positive and not meant to destroy though God has freedom to preserve that which He wills.